This article is from mid-2021, but addresses a timely issue given the prominence of “replacement theory” among much of the right.
Joe Pinsker at the Atlantic writes:
The two main ways to help people have the babies they want are to give them time and give them money. A country can offer financial support in the form of cash and tax credits; it can also promote job flexibility by funding parental-leave and child-care programs, and providing job protections to parents who opt into part-time work. These strategies, demographers told me, address two core reasons why many people who want kids hesitate to have them: because they can’t afford to, and because they don’t want to compromise on their career.
What’s notable about Pinsker’s framing of the issue is his focus on evidence and individual preference. Pinsker is primarily concerned that adults feel like they cannot afford to have as many kids as they prefer, rather than fretting about racial or cultural ‘replacement’ or geopolitical power. It’s also notable that the solution he promotes is to provide straight-forward economic assistance to parents rather than attempting to shame or coerce women into having more kids as Fox’s pundits or Republican politicians do.
I found a few other interesting facts while browsing the web for information (I don’t have all citations, but the PRB is good).
Some recent news also has me wondering about some specific factors that may be stopping people from having more kids, including
If we are concerned about the societal consequences of low birth rates (and I’m not sure that I am), then we, as a society should at least make concrete efforts to assure that everyone who wants kids is able to have them… instead of letting politicians use this as another culture war issue to divide us.
Posts must present a serious debate topic
For general discussion see: !firstname.lastname@example.org